by Lance Somoza

Brian Heater for TechCrunch:

A spokesperson told TechCrunch, “We can’t wait for people to experience HomePod, Apple’s breakthrough wireless speaker for the home, but we need a little more time before it’s ready for our customers. We’ll start shipping in the US, UK and Australia in early 2018.”

On the last two Fatherboard episodes, I speculated this might be the case since we hadn’t heard anything more from Apple on a release date.

This isn’t one of those must-have-on-day-one products, so I doubt there will be any backlash in Apple taking the time to get it right. Furthermore, delaying past the holiday shopping season speaks volumes on how much they care about their products. They don’t want to rush something out that is unfinished.

Still crickets on that iMac Pro, though…

Remember the delight of experiencing iPhone for the first time back in 2007? That vision of the future, free from flip phones, T9 texting, WAP websites, carrier logos plastered all over your device — the list goes on.

Ten years have gone by in the blink of an eye, and there is still no mistaking the clear and apparent magic dwelling in every iPhone. Never has that been more apparent than iPhone X — Apple’s modern masterpiece.

As much as the original was a vision of the future, so is iPhone X, as a wondrous piece of magic glass.

Apple has never been afraid of changing the iPhone experience on us when new technology demands it. Never before, though, have they changed it so radically than is apparent with iPhone X. Never before has Apple released three different flagship phones with differing interface elements. You know what they say — never say never. Apple is keeping us on our toes.

It’s a year of massive change for iPhone, so let’s dive in with my most extensive review yet.


After brief woes on the Dodgers, we dig into our amazing experiences using iPhone X over the past week ahead of Lance’s forthcoming review.

Note: In this episode, we may have accidentally said the phone has been out for two weeks, when it really has been one.


  • iPhone X

    • Pick Up/Delivery Experiences
    • Design
    • Screen
    • Gestures
    • Face ID
    • Other
  • Other

    • A [?] bug
    • Apple’s AirPower mat may cost $199.
    • A $12,000 Beatles Jukebox


How to Listen

Contact/Follow Us

Warning: you are entering first world problem territory.

The car I bought earlier this year has Apple CarPlay, and it’s fantastic. If you’re not familiar with the functionality, CarPlay allows your iPhone to display a specially-designed iOS interface on a compatible car’s touchscreen. You can then access a set of stock iOS apps like Phone, Messages, Maps, and Podcasts, etc., along with a few select third-party apps such as Overcast, Tune In Radio, and Spotify. In other words, your car’s touchscreen acts like a secondary display for your phone. It is highly simplistic by nature, but leaps and bounds better than crappy ‘infotainment’ systems and their crappy interfaces.

I love CarPlay mostly for Maps 1, as it displays directions on your car’s screen just like a standalone GPS would. Siri is also super helpful in the car when composing an iMessage or placing a call — the usual stuff.

The only downside of CarPlay is that I have to plug in my phone every time I get in the car. I don’t have the freedom to just start the engine and have it connect automatically like it would if I were using a standard Bluetooth connection that’s been around for years. Sure, it’s nice that the phone also begins charging since it’s plugged in, but unless I’m on a road trip, I would be more than happy with a slower charging rate say via… wireless charging. I think you know where I’m going with this.

You see, Apple launched a wireless implementation of CarPlay in September 2015 along with iOS 9, but it has yet to be widely adopted. Only a few automakers and/or third-parties support it. Hell, standard CarPlay is just now seeing larger adoption amongst automakers and third-parties, but I digress. To use wireless CarPlay, your car must meet Apple’s standard CarPlay requirements in addition to having a Wi-Fi radio 2 and appropriate automaker support. And I don’t think I need to tell you how slow automakers are when it comes to adopting this kind of technology.

With the introduction of Qi charging in the iPhone 8, iPhone 8 Plus, and iPhone X, I’m hoping we’ll see increased adoption of wireless CarPlay sooner rather than later. Think about it — this setup has the convenience of Bluetooth audio, the huge convenience of CarPlay itself, and the convenience of charging without plugging in a cable. I want to get in the car, rest my iPhone X down on a Qi charging pad (or not) 3, all while having it connect to wireless CarPlay automatically.

Some cars come with Qi chargers built in, so automakers are sort of getting there. Now that iPhone 8 and iPhone X have launched, there’s no better time for Apple to push for rapid adoption.

  1. Yes, Apple Maps. In my experience, it’s on par with Google Maps nowadays. ↩︎

  2. Which my Honda does have, so it’s even more frustrating that they haven’t turned on support for this. ↩︎

  3. It would have to be grabby or cushioned to ensure the phone stays put. ↩︎

Swati Khandelwal for The Hacker News:

Yesterday some users spotted a fake version of the most popular WhatsApp messaging app for Android on the official Google Play Store that has already tricked more than one million users into downloading it.

The app maker added a Unicode character space after the actual WhatsApp Inc. name, which in computer code reads WhatsApp+Inc%C2%A0.

However, this hidden character space at the end of the WhatsApp Inc. would be easily invisible to an average Android user browsing Google Play Store, allowing this dodgy version of the app to masquerade as a product of WhatsApp Inc.

According to Redditors, who first spotted this fake app on Friday, the app was not a chat app; instead, it served Android users with advertisements to download other apps.

What a total shit show. Google removed the app from the Play Store, but not before it was downloaded by one million people. Think about how damaging this could be to the WhatsApp brand. I also wonder how vulnerable this makes Google to a lawsuit.

Google has touted advanced malware scanning as a feature of Android 8.0 Oreo, dubbed Google Play Protect. That’s nice and all, but this protection should be baked in to the Play Store for everyone, not only for operating systems with a .2% market share. Turns out the often-complained about walled garden that is Apple’s App Store has its benefits.

A collection of Interesting stuff about Apple’s new iPhone X. I’ll be updating this as more is discovered.

11/3 at 5:30pm:

Apple’s CYA Article on OLED Color Shifting and Burn-In

Apple has posted an article with more information on the Super Retina Display. Of most interest, they call out the normalcy of OLED that is color shifting and possible burn-in:

If you look at an OLED display off-angle, you might notice slight shifts in color and hue. This is a characteristic of OLED and is normal behavior. With extended long-term use, OLED displays can also show slight visual changes. This is also expected behavior and can include “image persistence” or “burn-in,” where the display shows a faint remnant of an image even after a new image appears on the screen. This can occur in more extreme cases such as when the same high contrast image is continuously displayed for prolonged periods of time. We’ve engineered the Super Retina display to be the best in the industry in reducing the effects of OLED “burn-in.”

To mitigate this, Apple recommends keeping iPhone X updated, using auto-brightness, setting Auto Lock to a short duration, and avoiding the display of static images at maximum brightness for long periods of time.

These are normal concerns with any OLED panel. From my personal experience, the off-angle color shifting is noticeable, but not terrible. Apple says they engineered the OLED panel in iPhone X to be the best ever, so this is more likely some good “CYA” in the event customers experience light burn in after a lot of use. Hey, it could be worse.

11/3 at 2pm:

Face ID in Action

The Verge used a camcorder’s night vision mode to capture video of the iPhone X’s dot projector in action. This is very similar to Microsoft Kinect. Apple of course bought PrimeSense, the company behind the original Kinect back in 2013. Today, we witness the fruits of their labor.

iFixit Teardown

iFixit has performed their annual new-iPhone teardown, and it doesn’t disappoint. From reading through the teardown, it’s clear iPhone X is an engineering marvel. Take a look at the L-shaped battery composed of two cells, the stacked logic board, the TrueDepth camera system, and more. Unreal!

I picked up my iPhone X this morning and am absolutely loving it so far. Face ID hasn’t failed once, and the screen is so good it almost doesn’t look real. I’ll be making plenty of notes over the next few days in preparation for my full review in about a week’s time.

We’re only halfway through the week and Apple has been throwing nothing but curveballs — fitting since game seven of the World Series is tonight (go Dodgers!). Before we dive into a few of the reviews, here’s what I think could be happening.

Apple’s iPhone X Review Strategy

Typically, all major tech publications, independent publishers, etc. receive evaluation units for new Apple products about a week before pre-order of the product itself. Then, there’s an publishing embargo put in place until the week of on-sale. Once the embargo lifts, the proverbial floodgates open to a multitude of reviews. 1 This time, Apple has forgone the same old formula and opted to provide varying degrees of hands-on time with iPhone X.

Review Types

Three distinct types of reviews can be derived from Apple’s strategy.

  • First Impressions. Quite a few small-time YouTubers and non-technical publications were invited to an Apple-hosted event where they had hands-on time with iPhone X. This resulted in quite a few repetitive videos showcasing the design, Face ID, Animoji, and the TrueDepth camera’s portrait lighting mode. Less technical in content, these videos are sure to appeal mostly to the followers of said groups (read: millennials and the non-technical masses).
  • 24-Hour Reviews. A second group of technically-minded folks and publications received a mere 24 hours with iPhone X, resulting in madly-dashed quasi-reviews or first impressions.
  • Standard Reviews. The third and most privileged group received a week with iPhone X, the typical pre-embargo timeframe.

Why the change?

There has been much speculation (mostly negative) as to why Apple would change their standard formula for this important part of a new device’s launch. Not helped by questionable articles such as this, most theories center around the concept that the reasoning could be to temper expectations for Face ID not working as well as promised. My gut tells me this isn’t exactly right, but not far from the path. Most that have spent time with iPhone X have indicated Face ID works well, while a few have been more vocal about its misses.

There doesn’t seem to be an exact correlation as to which publishers received more or less time with iPhone X. For instance, John Gruber only received his within the last 48 hours, and he is generally regarded as the go-to for Apple coverage. On the other hand, Steven Levy spent a week with iPhone X — quite fitting, he being one of the three early-access reviewers for the original iPhone. Further adding to the confusion, David Pogue, another one of the early-access reviewers for the original iPhone, only received 24 hours. 2

My theory is this: Face ID meets Apple’s expectations, but after the hoopla that resulted from the Apple Watch Series 3 Wi-Fi bug which was largely a non-issue in practice, Apple may have wanted to better control the experience most reviewers would have with iPhone X by restricting their hands-on time. This is where the strategy starts to take shape.

  • First Impressions. Obvious opportunity for non-technical thoughts and opinions that increase overall hype, but should only be taken at face value. These should be seen as nothing more than a brilliant marketing move, even if technically-minded folks don’t care much for the content (e.g. yours truly).
  • 24-Hour Reviews. Given to publications either more critical of Apple than others or typically-positive Apple publishers as to not appear biased. For example, Nilay Patel from The Verge is a notoriously nit picky reviewer, especially when it comes to Apple. In his review, he was very vocal about issues he had with Face ID, and went on to wildly speculate as to the reason. I’ll quote him below to provide more context. As for not appearing biased, this could explain why Apple reviewer staples like Gruber, Pogue, and Rene Ritchie also fell into this category.
  • Standard Reviews. Steven Levy from Wired and Matthew Panzarino from TechCrunch were among the small number of folks to receive a week with iPhone X. This is Apple’s way of providing what is typically expected while taking into account the oddities described above.

This is a huge launch for Apple and a major change to the iPhone line unseen since its genesis. The message here has to be very controlled and this was their way of doing it. Before review units went out, a lot of people thought Apple would only seed a small amount of devices to reviewers. We now see they’ve done quite the opposite by offering varying degress of access while still retaining a semblance of control. I would be very surprised if this format becomes the new normal for typical product launches. HomePod and iMac Pro are expectedly up next, so we’ll see.

Review Roundup

Without further ado, on to the reviews.

Matthew Panzarino for TechCrunch:

At several points, the unlock procedure worked so well in pitch black or at weird angles that I laughed out loud. You get over the amazement pretty quickly, but it feels wild the first few dozen times you do it.

It works so quickly and seamlessly that after a while, you forget it’s unlocking the device — you just raise and swipe. Every once in a while you’ll catch the Face ID animation as it unlocks. Most of the time, though, it just goes. This, coupled with the new “all swipe” interface, makes using the phone and apps feel smooth and interconnected.

This has been my favorite review. Matt took his iPhone X to Disneyland, which is a real workout for any phone. As a result, you’re left with an extremely palatable sense of what it’s capable of.

Steven Levy for Wired:

Filling the phone surface with the screen has another effect: There’s no longer room for the home button, an integral part of the iPhone interface since the start. Its sudden removal is one of those jarring deletions that Apple is famous for, and it requires some relearning. But that’s not necessarily bad: Any upgrade which doesn’t require new behavior is almost by definition not terribly dramatic. Plus, Apple hates buttons. In any case, Apple now requires us to swipe upwards to get to the home screen. That was easy enough. A little trickier is the swipe-and-stop required to get to the carousel of open apps; it took me awhile to get the hang of pressing down on one of the little cards representing an app in order to evoke a minus sign that allowed me to close it.

I knew I’d mastered the gestures when I found myself trying to use them on my iPad. Oops. My finger no longer drifts to the home button, but pathetically swipes upwards, to no avail. And now there’s that awkward moment when I expect the iPad to unlock itself when the camera looks at my face.

Rene Ritchie for iMore:

Apple is also individually calibrating every iPhone X before it leaves the factory. That’s not something most vendors do. (Some barely sample at all, others only a few per batch.) It’s something Apple’s been calibrating that way since it moved to DCI-P3 cinematic color gamut a couple of years ago.

Combined with Apple’s system-level color management, it means the display won’t look oddly blue or green, and some iPhone X won’t look cooler or warmer than others. They won’t look washed out and dull like Pixel 2 XL or oversaturated like Samsung Galaxy S8. They’ll all, every single one of them, look exactly the way nature and Apple intended — like an iPhone.

Just as I would expect from Apple.

Nilay Patel for The Verge:

In my early tests, Face ID worked well indoors: sitting at my desk, standing in our video studio, and waiting in line to get coffee. You have to look at it head-on, though: if it’s sitting on your desk you have to pick up the phone and look at it, which is a little annoying if you’re used to just putting your finger on the Touch ID sensor to check a notification.

I took a walk outside our NYC office in bright sunlight, and Face ID definitely had issues recognizing my face consistently while I was moving until I went into shade or brought the phone much closer to my face than usual. I also went to the deli across the street, which has a wide variety of lights inside, including a bunch of overhead florescent strips, and Face ID also got significantly more inconsistent.

As I said earlier, Nilay has been the most vocal about his Face ID issues. I won’t discount his experience completely, because it seems warranted to a degree. However, he also does hold the phone at some odd angles, as seen in the video portion of his review. I doubt direct sunlight is the issue, as nobody else seemed to draw this conclusion. Neil Cybart from Above Avalon even made this video in light of Nilay’s claims:

To appreciate technology, you need to have an open mind. Nothing is perfect, but remaining optimistic is the key to not letting these things deter you. Nobody said living on the bleeding edge of tech doesn’t come without hiccups.

I can’t wait to get my iPhone X on Friday and look forward to publishing my own review after spending some quality time with it.

Updated on November 2 at 12:30pm with a slight correction regarding those who received iPhone X for more than 24 hours.

  1. See: iPhone 8. The amount of reviews was a little overwhelming. ↩︎

  2. Walt Mossberg is the third and final early-access reviewer for the original iPhone, but is now retired. ↩︎

Everything I write and publish to my site is directly from my iPad Pro 10.5-inch, made possible by iOS 11 and some amazing apps. When I launched Gaddgict, I didn’t plan on working this way, but it has become so fun and compelling that I don’t even consider using my MacBook Pro or anything else to accomplish these tasks. In fact, the only thing I use my MacBook Pro for is the site’s development, since I can make changes safely in my test environment before publishing to the production server.

I’ll be writing mostly about the Editorial app since that’s where all my writing and publishing takes place. I’ll also call out a few other apps I use as part of my workflow. I felt compelled to share this process since the interest in iOS automation seems to be on the rise. I hope you’ll find my perspective and approach useful.

Preface: CMS Setup

The CMS Gaddgict runs on is called HTMLy. It’s a simple, yet powerful flat-file system, and I’ve been able to easily tweak it to suit my needs since Gaddgict launched earlier this year. Let me preface the iPad setup by level-setting a couple things about how HTMLy works. This will help to better illustrate how I implemented certain tasks in Editorial.

  • All posts are stored in folders related to their category (e.g. Apple, Gadgets, General, Google, etc.)
  • Each post has metadata embedded inside as HTML comments which HTMLy references on the server. For example, the title and tags for a post are written as seen below.
  • Each post’s filename must be written as such: YYYY-MM-DD-HH-MM-SS_tags,are,

<!-- t How I write and publish Gaddgict with iPad Pro and Editorial t-->

<!-- tag iPad Pro,Editorial,iOS Automation tag-->

My Setup Overview

Here’s an overview of my setup. Note: apps listed are linked with my iTunes affiliate ID, so if you decide to purchase one of these via a link below, you’ll be helping me out a little bit!

iPad Pro and Smart Keyboard

I’ll direct your attention to my iPad Pro 10.5-inch review for my full thoughts on this wonderful device. However, I’d like to take a minute to talk about the Smart Keyboard here.

I bought the Smart Keyboard with the iPad not knowing exactly if I would like it. Now that I have been typing on it for months, I was and am still shocked by how good it is. The key travel is perfect, 1 the material has a great feel and is easily maintainable, the smart connector integration is genius, it doubles as a stand for watching video, the list goes on.

My only gripe with the Smart Keyboard is its lack of a forward delete key combo, which is essential for writing. This was initially a problem until I created a workflow in Editorial to accomplish this as you’ll see below.


There are quite a few really great writing apps for iOS. There’s Ulysses, Bear Notes, Byword, and more. For me, Editorial takes the cake thanks to its built-in workflow system that allows for custom Python scripting. It’s made by the developer of the highly-acclaimed Pythonista app, Ole Zorn.

My Favorite Features

Editorial has all the usual features you’d expect in a writing app like Markdown, exporting, syntax highlighting, etc. Here are a few other features that are standouts for me:

  • Dropbox Sync. Allows for easy editing when I’m away from my iPad and want to jot down a few more sentences from my iPhone. While this works, I wish syncing with iCloud was a viable option, as I don’t use Dropbox for anything else.
  • Snippets. Similar to the famous Text Expander service, you can create word abbreviations which are transformed into whatever your heart desires. For instance: typing ‘ppp’ pastes the current contents of your clipboard (a default snippet).
  • Templates. Ability to create templates for writing formats used most often. These are actually the same as workflows, but they can be found under the ‘New File’ menu once created.
  • Workflows. See below.
  • Python Scripting. As mentioned, Editorial can handle Python scripting to enable really powerful automation (as you will see). 2


Workflows are where the real power of Editorial comes into play. Creating your own workflows is made easy by the plethora of pre-constructed actions you can build custom flows with, some of which offer impressive integration with iOS. To name a few:

  • Find & Replace (with regex support)
  • Moving the caret
  • Storing variables
  • Changing text case
  • Sharing via iOS share sheet
  • And much more…

Editorial has fantastic documentation on how to use the pre-constructed actions and advanced Python modules.

Workflow Directory

Editorial also has a Workflow Directory where you can share workflows you have created and download ones created by others. There are quite a number of awesome workflows on there. In fact, I’ll be sharing template versions of the ones I wrote below.

My Workflows

What follows are the main workflows I built to write and publish Gaddgict.

Forward Delete

As mentioned above, the Smart Keyboard itself does not have a way to perform a forward delete. However, I was able to write a workflow in Editorial and bind it to a key combination to mimic a forward delete like so:

  1. Extend the current selection forward by one character.
  2. Replace the character with nothing.

That’s it! I binded the combo to Control + \, mimicking the normal key spacing for forward delete on a Mac (Fn + Del). I thought Editorial would lag a little bit if I spammed the key combo repeatedly, but it doesn’t at all. It functions exactly like a forward delete should (you can even hold the key combo down to for continuous delete).

Get this workflow.

SFTP Image Upload

While a majority of my posts tend to not have images, when I feel inclined to include any, this workflow will securely upload them to my server over SFTP and insert the appropriate HTML into my current document. It goes a little something like this:

  1. Asks for the alt/title text to be used for the image and stores it in variable imgALT.
  2. Runs a custom Python script that brings up the iOS Photo Selector so I can choose the image to be used, which is then copied to the clipboard.
  3. Runs another custom Python script to:
    • Generate a unique name for the image.
    • Paste and save the image temporarily within Editorial.
    • Upload the image to the server over SFTP.
    • Delete the image from Editorial.
    • Copies the permalink to the image to the clipboard.
  4. Inserts the following into the document:

    <img src="[Clipboard]" alt="[imgALT]" title="[imgALT]">

I love this workflow because it allows me to see a live preview of the images within my post. If SFTP isn’t your thing, you can also adapt this script to use regular (insecure) FTP via the Python ftplib module. 3

Here’s an example of my workflow:

New Post Template & Custom UI

You can also create custom templates, which are really workflows, to further automate things. For instance, my original ‘New Post Template’ prompted me separately for things like the post title, post type, and the meta description. This was great, but then I delved into Editorial’s awesome Custom UI builder.

Now when I’m creating a new article, I’m presented with a simple form to fill in the basics and populate the meat and potatoes of the post itself.

Here’s how it works:


When I’m done writing, this is the main workflow that publishes a new post to the blog and a bit more. Although there are many more individual steps than this, here is an abridged version of what this script does:

  1. Syncs the document with Dropbox.
  2. Sets a few variables to be used later:
    • Identifies and stores the post type (e.g. post, link, video, image) in a variable from the HTML comments in the file. I accomplish this using simple regex patterns. For instance, here’s the pattern for capturing the title : <! --t (.*) t-->
    • Same for post category (e.g. Apple, General, Google, Site News, etc.).
    • Same for the post title, but also strips away special characters via a regular expression. Also converts spaces to dashes and makes the whole string lowercase. This will be used to formulate the file name to be read by HTMLy.
    • Same for post tags.
  3. Runs the main Python script to formulate the proper file name to be used on the server and upload the file via SFTP 4 to the correct directory.
  4. Runs a sub-workflow that contains a Python script to clear the site’s cache.
  5. Inserts the file name of the document on the server into the bottom of the post. This can later be used by my separate ‘Update Post’ workflow if I need to make corrections or otherwise update an existing post.
  6. Opens the iOS Share Sheet with the article’s permalink attached and the title copied to the clipboard. From here, I can quickly tweet out the link using Tweetbot without ever leaving Editorial. 5
  7. Opens the following tabs within Editorial’s built-in browser:
    • Share to Facebook page with the permalink for the new article already attached. 6
    • Google Search Console so I can request Google to index the new article.
    • The new article live on the site so I can verify it is loading correctly.
  8. Sync with Dropbox one more time since the name of the file on the server is now stored in the document (from step #5).

Get this workflow. Note: you’ll have to tweak this, of course. I’m not including the sub-workflow that clears my site cache (step 4 above), since it just connects to my server and runs a command over SSH. Same goes for the Update Post workflow below.

Here’s the workflow in action:

Update Post

Similar to the Publish workflow above, this one is for updating an existing post already on the site. It goes a little something like this:

  1. Grabs all the variables just like Step 2 from the ‘Publish’ workflow.
    • Additionally: checks to see if the post tags have changed. If so, it will reformulate the filename to be used on the server.
  2. Grabs the file name for this post on the server (the one stored at the bottom of the document by Step 5 above).
  3. Uploads and replaces the existing file on the server via SFTP.
  4. Runs a sub-workflow that contains a Python script to clear the site’s cache.
  5. Opens the updated post on the site within Editorial’s built-in browser.

I won’t bore you with a video for this one, since it’s largely the same as the Publish workflow.

Get this workflow.

Affinity Photo

When using images in my posts, I’m typically dealing with quick cropping and basic manipulation. Affinity Photo does this with ease and definitely offers the closest-to-Photoshop-like experience on iPad than any other app. On occasion, I’ve used it to create more detailed images for feature posts like ‘Home Smart Home’ or my Amazon Echo Show Review, and it has just been a joy to use. There’s an initial learning curve when it comes to the UI, but nothing a little exploration can’t solve.

Workflow (App)

Workflow is a small, yet convenient part of my … well … workflow. Here are the actions I have setup:

New Article Template

Calls the ‘New Article Template’ workflow in Editorial. In other words, I can jump into writing a new article from anywhere by triggering this action from the Workflow widget in the iOS Today view.

New Quick Link

Calls my ‘New Qlink’ workflow in Editorial. From there, I can quickly share a link that is displayed at the top of the index page under the “Quick Links” tab.

Clear Site Cache

In order to clear my site’s server-side cache, I can trigger this workflow to run the server script (over SSH) that does just that. In fact, this is the same server script Editorial runs after a new post is uploaded. The real cool part about this one is triggering it from my Apple Watch. I can’t help but geek out every time I clear my site’s cache from my wrist.

Transmit and Prompt

Made by popular developer Panic, I use Transmit and Prompt for SFTP and SSH respectively. They have similar features as other apps, but offer best-in-class UI and UX on iPad in my opinion. Not to mention their Panic Sync feature is great, which keeps server and login info up-to-date between my iPad and iPhone.


My entire setup took a decent amount of time to put together (and I’m still refining it). Would it have been easier to use a Mac or something more off-the-shelf? Possibly, but it was fun as hell to build all this. It really showcases the power of iPad Pro and paints the picture of a truly capable machine versus a media consumption device.

Feel free to reach out to me if you have any questions on Editorial, the workflows, or anything else.

If I can do all this for my site, just imagine how easy non-technical tasks will become or have already become. Apple’s vision of the iPad as the new standard computing device for the average user is closer than ever.

  1. Dare I say even better than key travel on MacBook Pro? Shots fired, I know. ↩︎

  2. I never had written anything in Python before using Editorial, but the learning curve is pretty small if you’ve written in any other languages. It’s fun, yet powerful. ↩︎

  3. I wouldn’t recommend it. Security and privacy are important. ↩︎

  4. I’m using Python’s Paramiko module for SSH transfers. ↩︎

  5. This is a recent addition, as Tweetbot barely gained iOS share sheet functionality. ↩︎

  6. It’s a shame you can’t use the Facebook share extension to post to a page (timeline only), similar to how I do it with Tweetbot. ↩︎

So, Best Buy is selling all iPhone X models $100 above retail if you buy the phone outright (not on a payment plan). Dumb, right? Wait until you read their “reason” for doing so.

Joe Rossignol for MacRumors:

In a statement issued to MacRumors, Best Buy said its prices reflect a customer’s ability to “get a phone the way they want.”

“Our prices reflect the fact that no matter a customer’s desired plan or carrier, or whether a customer is on a business or personal plan, they are able to get a phone the way they want at Best Buy. Our customers have told us they want this flexibility and sometimes that has a cost,” a Best Buy spokesperson told MacRumors.

It’s almost like they tried to write a purposely awful statement.

I mean flexibility? This is the best they could come up with — a half-baked explanation for what is plain and simple price gouging? They are supposedly price matching it down to the MSRP upon request, which makes the optics of this even worse.

Also, they say customers “want this flexibility” meaning what, exactly? Surely not the $100 increase, because they continue with “sometimes that has a cost” as if they are sticking it to them. Look, Best Buy can sell it for whatever they want, but at least don’t bullshit everyone.

Side note: I find it hilarious that a company named Best Buy literally has the worst buy for iPhone X amongst retailers.

I waited to comment on this article by Alex Webb and Sam Kim from Bloomberg wherein they report on Apple’s supposed production issues with iPhone X because I figured John Gruber would say it best (he did).

The main charge in the original article:

As of early fall, it was clearer than ever that production problems meant Apple Inc. wouldn’t have enough iPhone Xs in time for the holidays. The challenge was how to make the sophisticated phone — with advanced features such as facial recognition — in large enough numbers.

As Wall Street analysts and fan blogs watched for signs that the company would stumble, Apple came up with a solution: It quietly told suppliers they could reduce the accuracy of the face-recognition technology to make it easier to manufacture, according to people familiar with the situation.

Apple refutes it outright, and Gruber’s take on what that means:

Apple spokeswoman Trudy Muller said “Bloomberg’s claim that it reduced the accuracy spec for Face ID is completely false and we expect Face ID to be the new gold standard for facial authentication. The quality and accuracy of Face ID haven’t changed; it continues to be one in a million probability of a random person unlocking your iPhone with Face ID.”

It is extraordinary for Apple to issue a blanket “this is completely false” statement on any news story. Apple, as policy, no-comments every news story, even when they know it’s bullshit. So either this story is particularly strong bullshit, or Apple is lying, on the record, under one of their own real names (as opposed to the anonymous “an Apple spokesperson” attribution).

Gruber on perceptions of biometric authentication:

People are naturally skeptical about biometric ID systems. They were skeptical about Touch ID when it was still only rumored, just like they’re skeptical now about Face ID. Today, though, Touch ID is both trusted and familiar. So rumors claiming that Apple really wanted to get Touch ID into iPhone X but had to settle for Face ID play into both the skepticism of the new and the comfort of the familiar. FUD is one of the oldest tricks in the book.

Check out John’s whole post. He really dives in, speaking to Bloomberg’s track record (and Ming-Chi Kuo’s), plus insights derived from conversations he’s had with actual Apple engineers.

Here’s my take: everyone loves a good controversy, and in the tech world, Apple controversies get the most clicks (whether they are real or manufactured). Some people love to see Apple fail, or even just the perception of Apple failing is enough. Why? I think I have a decent answer.

From where I stand, the public perception of Apple may be that they are some kind of infallible entity. However, until Liam takes over, Apple is still run by humans, and humans are anything but infallible. In other words, writing a FUD article on Apple is especially easy. Should anyone be writing an article like this? I don’t see the constructive point, regardless of the company in which its about. I wouldn’t wish it on Samsung, Google, et al. Rumors are one thing, but this is straight-up FUD.

I have faith in Face ID and think it will be transformational. Apple would have nixed it long ago if they didn’t strongly believe in it.


My Dad and I talk iPhone X launch expectations, our final color choices, MacBook keyboard problems, the direction of the MacBook, and more.


  • Quick early detour:
    • My favorite ‘newer’ band: The Dear Hunter
    • Our Dodgers are in the World Series! (condolences to John Gruber and the Yankees)
  • iPhone X
    • Launch expectations
    • Apple iPhone Upgrade Program pre-approval process
    • Our final color choices
    • “What if the iPhone 8 Plus is better than the iPhone X?”
  • Mac
    • My Mom is getting her first Mac (she doesn’t know it yet)
    • What is Apple doing with the MacBook line?
      • Touchbar hasn’t found its calling
      • Growing butterfly key mechanism issues
  • Google Pixel 2XL Screen Issues
  • Essential Phone now priced at $499


How to Listen

Contact/Follow Us

Christina Farr for CNBC:

John Hancock, one of the largest life insurance providers, is partnering with Apple to offer all of its new and existing members of its Vitality program a steeply discounted Apple Watch.

The program offers perks and rewards to people who live healthy lifestyles. Any consumer who signs up for the program is eligible to get the device for $25.

As long as Vitality members exercise regularly for two years, they will be allowed to keep the device for free. If they don’t, they’ll have to pay it off in installments. The Series 3 costs upwards of $299.

It’s really $25 plus tax, so you’re looking at roughly $50 — $70. Still not a bad deal.

According to the same page, the way you pay it off is by earning 500 fitness-related Vitality Points per month over two years (12,000 total points). These points are applied towards the cost of the Watch, and you therefore avoid any additional charges. I’m not sure how the points system works in actuality, so it’s not exactly clear how attainable this is.

That said, they have had success with the pilot version of the program as Christina discusses:

John Hancock, which is owned by Manulife, first started offering Apple Watches to a limited set of members — people who purchased life insurance policies over $2 million — several years ago.

After logging a 20 percent increase in activity under the program, it decided to extend it to all U.S. members

About half of the people who received the device achieved their monthly goals and did not pay for the device, John Hancock senior vice president Brooks Tingle told CNBC.

I’m surprised the amount of people that hit their goals is so high. I would expect that to dip now that all their customers are eligible for this promotion. Some may even treat it as a deferred lease and just pay it off at the end.

Either way, it’s interesting to see Apple find more and more ways to push the Watch, and deservedly so for Series 3. Just imagine when there’s a real ‘Medical Series’ version that is FDA certified.

Darrell Etherington for TechCrunch:

Essential has an offer that’s honestly very hard to refuse: The price of the Essential Phone (PH-1, going by technical model number), is now $200 cheaper, so $499 off-contract and unlocked.


Lest Essential’s earliest customers feel slighted, it has a deal for early buyers, too – they’ll receive a $200 ‘friends and family’ credit they can use to further discount (valid through December 15, 2017) a device for a loved one (or another for themselves, if they maybe also want the just-released white Essential Phone, for instance), or to buy the 360-camera attachment. Customers will be able to sign up to redeem the $200 credit on the Essential page, using their phone’s IMEI and serial numbers, along with the email address they used to purchase.

$499 (or even $599) should have been its price to begin with. Essential doesn’t have the clout to expect a large number of purchases on a $699 device, but hey, good on them for trying. As Darrell says in the article, $499 makes Essential Phone a hell of a deal if you’re in the market for a barebones Android device. 1

  1. Make sure you’re OK with the somewhat lacking camera quality as well. ↩︎